Peter the Pirate
Many of you would most likely see me as suffering from a peter pan complex, and that might be one of the kinder labels tossed in my direction. While I do not argue the label, there is the inclination to challenge the validity of the mainstream concept of an adult. Most in making the judgement are not questioning my intelligence, maturity, or understanding. Often it's quite the opposite, with my analysis, and understanding being valued, and sought. The seeming disconnect happens from my perspective in large part due to how people define an adult. So what makes a well adjusted adult human? Is it being able to conform and fit in, becoming a "successful contributing member of society"? To a degree this would seem an obvious answer, how could one argue with being a success? What happens when a culture is sick, is it still the rational choice to become what that culture covets? This is of course the idea, that being considered sane in an insane society is not a measure of psychological health. Take a little stroll with me, and maybe, just maybe, you'll find a little bit of the Pan you once were.
Institutionalized
In the west we are so proud of our institutions, be they educational, financial, religious, the list goes on and on. We leave off the flip side, prisons, mental hospitals, we do this because in general people have been taught to see the world in terms of polarity. This of course ignores the fact, these are opposames masquerading as opposites, with the outcome of being institutionalized.
: to cause (a custom, practice, law, etc.) to become accepted and used by many people : to establish (something) as an institution
: to put (someone, such as a mentally ill person) in an institution
These are connotations of pavlovian conditioning, not education, or child development. Taken to it's extreme the goal of an institution is to become indispensable, and condition those in it to become unable to function without it. There is ample evidence this has been intentional, of course labeled as conspiracy theory. Frankly that it has gotten that most dismissive of labels only warrants closer inspection. Take moment, and look for yourself, Dodd Report, deliberate dumbing down,
or even though I'm leary of Alex Jones. Our much vaunted education system was hijacked long ago to keep a fresh supply of human capital ready for exploitation by the corporate institutions. We want to believe so badly in basic beneficence of our culture, that we ignore some basic facts. Entrenched systems of power seek to protect their position. Our leaders are selected from, and by these same institutions. People say they wish only happiness for their children, or they wish for their child to be the best them they can be. Than they package them off to be institutionalized so they can find their place in society.
Taking Candy from the Mouths of Babies Mama's
Marketing and Consumerism go hand in glove, like peanut butter, and jelly, and damn have we gotten good at it. I have no doubt even Edward Bernays would be amazed by the level of sophistication our propaganda has risen to. I call it propaganda because that is exactly what it is, structuring information to create a desired outcome. In this case parting someone from some currency in exchange for a product, or service. As corrupt and shortsighted as this economic model might be on the whole. When directed at children, it might just be a crime against humanity. An extreme statement to be sure, but one that is not very difficult to back up. Critical reasoning skills are needed in order to counter the automatic psychological processes exploited by advertisers. Child development, and psychology experts are employed by organizations who have as their motivation profit. These folks use all their skill and understanding, not to enrich the life of your child. Nah it's used to know how to make advertising that gets your child to ask for the product in as few as views as possible. So what you say, my 5 year old does not make the buying decisions in my household. Only our experts on conditioning have that all worked out as well. We all have a surrender point, where we will agree to almost anything if only to make something stop. If you think this is something exploited only in interrogation, just think back to how many times you have caved to repeated pestering by your child. This is so well understood, even the big media creation outlets, such as disney, or nickelodeon have a nice predictable path set out for your childs idols. Introducing the faces they will grow up watching, engendering a sense of connection and trust. Using techniques as having the stars be just older than the audience, exploiting that natural tendency of looking up to those ahead of you. Transitioning actors with a generation, so as a group ages there is a continuity, and trust is deepened. This is even taken to the point of switching from childrens tv shows to music seemingly just as your teen has seeming grown headphones. In this obvious industrialized exploitation, and abuse of our young, it's unclear to me what is more disturbing. That it's happening at all, or that those who are supposed experts on child development, and psychology have raised no moral objections.
Judged by Our Hero's
There is a metric often used to understand the health of a culture, as well as where in the development cycle a civilization is. Who, and what are held in esteem shift as a civilization goes through it's life cycle. When a culture goes into decline, false or trivial accomplishment are celebrated beyond reason.
Activities that while they may have value, like sports, music, acting, cooking. Become blown to a status usually reserved for royalty. People that once would have considered a liability regardless of a skill or talent become held as idols. Style trumps substance, as leaders, and people stop asking is it right, in favor of is it legal, or can I get away with it. You'd like to imagine we are unique, the greatest nation, of the greatest people to ever grace the earth. While we do have unique traits, these stages of empire have happened for as long as there have been empires. The United States of today have far more than the eagle in common with the Roman empire. Ask yourself how many household names do we have today, that are just famous. They are not famous for doing anything, they are just famous for being rich, or outrageous. So while some jump on folks like Charles Barkley for saying he is not a role model, I applaud. Mr Barkley may be many things, even may be a good role model, but if he is, it has nothing to do with how well he did on the basketball court.
As always make up your own mind
Jack
aka
PanseyBard